You could say that there has been elements of dark and gritty in the fantasy genre for many years, with the past thirty years brewing the flavor of today’s edgy fantasy. From Glen Cook’s The Black Company, released in the mid-80’s, to George R.R. Martin’s Game of Thrones in the mid-90’s, to today’s popular authors like Joe Abercrombie (author of the First Law books), popular fantasy has moved away from the likes of Tolkien and C.S. Lewis. The straight edge hero has been replaced by the anti-hero, a character that is capable of womanizing, stealing and killing, but could be our hero on the basis that there are people worse than they are.
Grey and
flawed characters are the norm in today’s fiction, and it’s what readers desire
the most. But, in dark and gritty fantasy, flawed protagonists can be too
flawed. The whole purpose of producing imperfect characters in fantasy fiction
is so that readers are able to relate more to the characters, but how many of
us are assassins and mercenaries? How many of us are capable of rape and
murder? Can we really relate to these troubled characters, or is it more like
watching reality TV? After all, edgy fantasy is being called “Realistic Fantasy”
now (which is oxymoronic).
I remember
when the movie Million Dollar Baby came out, starring and directed by Clint
Eastwood. It starts out as a feel-good movie, almost like watching Rocky or the
Karate Kid, yet the ending took us all by surprise. It was unexpected,
shocking—depressing. But we all loved it, because of the unpredictability and
the drama. Clint Eastwood directed another movie called Mystic River, which gave us another
unpredictable, depressing ending. And, again, we loved it. I use these two
examples in cinema, because they were critically acclaimed and award winning
for having such dramatic, tragic stories. This same effect is sweeping the
fantasy genre. Readers are craving for “realism”. Readers are longing for
characters that they can either identify with, or love to hate, or hate to
love. Readers no longer want to use fantasy as an escape from reality, but now
they want the best of both worlds.
With all
the above said, I still believe, that at the end of the day, no one (at lease
most of us) do not want to be caught in a world where there is no hope and no
redemption for the characters. Death and despair is a part of reality, but so
is hope and triumph. Some of these worlds that we read about in these dark
fantasy books are so depressing you almost wonder why the characters even
bother to keep on living. There’s almost nothing worth living for. And if
readers cannot balance between dark fantasy and not-so-dark fantasy, but only
seek the gritty, then they kind of get caught into enjoying the demise of
others, and never walk away from a book having some thought of redemption or the
overcoming of a tragic past. A lot of readers cannot even return to the likes
of J.R.R. Tolkien or Terry Brooks, because they are addicted to the edge in
fantasy fiction.
Personally,
I think a good story should produce a degree of trouble in a character—an inner
struggle, an obsession, a troubled past, or a declining or deadly lifestyle.
But the story should be about the character’s triumph over some part of their
struggles. And if a main character dies, there should be a good cause to their
death, where it is not just shocking and upsetting to the reader, but
believable and bringing worth to the story.
I’ll use
another Clint Eastwood movie as an example: Gran Torino. The movie gives you
another element of unpredictability at the end, but it’s not tragic and
depressing; it’s sacrificial and, to a degree, uplifting. A character’s
unanticipated death was not just a scene to disturb us, but to show us that
even a flawed character can have true heart and sacrifice.
RELATED POSTS:
A Follow Up to The Dark and Gritty
I agree! Good luck and I hope to be reading you someday.
ReplyDelete