My love for
fantasy started when I was a kid, watching cartoons and movies in the genre. I
didn’t get into fantasy books until I was a teenager, and I can definitely say
that it was due to those cartoons and movies that I was drawn into reading fantasy
fiction. Today, cartoons are nowhere near what they were in the 70’s and 80’s, back
when they were saturated with entertaining fantasy settings; and the same goes
for movies. However, the successful adaptations of The Lord of the Rings, The
Hobbit, The Chronicles of Narnia and Harry Potter to the big screen have given
fantasy fiction a good face, and may be helping the genre like never before.
Even the Game of Thrones adaptation on HBO is giving the “adult” side of
fantasy a boost in sales (probably more so for Mr. Martin).
Fantasy stories
have been adapted to film since the early days of cinema, but Disney’s
adaptation of the Brothers Grimm’s, Sneewittchen,
better known as Snow White & the Seven Dwarves, was the first to break ground—becoming
the first of it’s kind. Not too long afterwards, MGM released the Wizard of Oz, based on
L. Frank Baum’s 1900 novel, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. Disney is keeping the
Oz legacy going with their latest release of Oz the Great Powerful, with
sequels to follow. I personally enjoyed the new Oz movie, and hope that the
follow-ups are just as good, if not better, even with Sam Raimi showing no
interest in directing the sequels.
In the
early days, fantasy books could only be effectively made for the screen via
animation, hence Disney’s success with movies like Cinderella, Alice in
Wonderland, Sleeping Beauty, and the Sword in the Stone. It was the animated
features of The Hobbit, The Lord of the Rings, and the Return of the King that
drew me in as a kid, topped off with The Last Unicorn.
Finally,
when the 80’s came, probably the first time I ever really saw a live-action
fantasy flick (apart from The Dark Crystal, which was not adapted from a book) was
the first time I saw Arnold Schwarzenegger. He played Conan in Conan the
Barbarian and Conan the Destroyer, based on Robert E. Howard’s character. I
watched those movies every time they came on TV. The Neverending Story was
another movie I had watched over and over. I never read the book, but the
author, Michael Ende, felt that the movie was so far different from his book
that he wanted the movie to stop being made, or else change the title of the
film. The makers of the movie continued with the production anyway. Ende was an
advisor for the script, but he claimed that the director/screenwriter, Wolfgang
Petersen, secretly rewrote the script. However, Petersen insisted that the
movie was very faithful to the novel.
The
Princess Bride movie was a well received adaptation by audiences, and fans of
the book seemed to love it as well. The author, William Goldman, did the
screenplay for the film, which is probably why it was conveyed to screen so
effectively. The screenwriter for the Stardust film tried to bring a Princess
Bride kind of feel to that adaptation. Neil Gaiman, the author of the novel,
seemed okay with the changes and adjustments in the movie, which were different
from the book.
Eragon and
The Golden Compass, are probably the most failed adaptations. These films were
supposed to spark a new series of movies based on the novels, but failed to
project strong stories on screen. In my opinion, Eragon was not very good, but
The Golden Compass wasn’t too bad. But, from those who read the book, The
Golden Compass movie was said to have been too close to the book (cramming in a
lot), and failing to include a vital part at the end.
It’s always
said that the movie is never as good as the book, because the movie cannot
offer the depth of characters and world-building like the book can. However,
many people cannot suffer through Tolkien’s long descriptions, but they’ll eat
the movies up. We should give thanks to Tolkien’s detail, because it gave Peter
Jackson and his crew everything they needed to create a visual Middle-earth. We
have to understand that literary fiction and cinema convey stories in extremely
different ways. One deals with capturing the mind and imagination, while the
other deals with capturing our eyes and ears, as well as our minds. The problem
with a lot of fantasy movies is that the makers work hard to dazzle us with
sights and sounds, but fail to capture our hearts with solid storytelling and
good acting. In literature, the writer has to pull us into their world and
convince us to take the characters’ journey.
When a
fantasy book is adapted to the screen, it's probably most assuring that
changes would have to be made to make the story effective for viewers; but it’s
important for the screenwriters and directors to render the spirit of the book
to the fullest. I am glad to see fantasy books transferred to the screen
effectively, and it’s keeping the fantasy genre strong. Not only that, but we
get to see the stories that we enjoyed in our heads for so long displayed with
the best visuals that the industry can dish out.
I’m not
going to lie, as an aspiring writer, I dream of seeing my book on the big
screen some day, with hundreds of millions of dollars funding the production,
and everyone falling in love with it. Like I said, it’s a dream. But, I know
that I am not the only one. Lots of authors dream of their stories becoming
movies, but there is the fear that their baby (their book) would not be given
due justice, and the whole thing could turn into a disappointment, like Michael
Ende, mentioned above.
I am
optimistic that more good fantasy novels will continue to be produced well for
the screen, and we will enjoy them for years to come. But I hope that
filmmakers learn from past failures, and aim to stay true to the heart of the stories.
RELATED POSTS:
From Book to Screen (Revisited)
Wheel of Time TV Series
RELATED POSTS:
From Book to Screen (Revisited)
Wheel of Time TV Series
No comments:
Post a Comment