The fantasy genre was born from the essence of mythology, folklore and fairytales—from sources that were created to craft illustrations of existence and beliefs; as well as morals, fears and superstitions. These primary sources fed the imagination, and manifested in civilizations, taking the forms of art, literature, traditions and religions. From the ancient times to the modern world, myths, legends and tales, in the most part, were infused with messages and morals. Allegories like the epic poem, The Faerie Queene, by Edmund Spenser, gave praise to Queen Elizabeth I and told tales of virtue; and the novel The Princess and the Goblin by George MacDonald gave a message of faith and hope.
In modern
fantasy, as character-driven stories becomes the archetype, the story is no
longer just a tale of good against evil, but illustrations of life with a
fantasy setting. Now we are journeying into the human experience within the
pages of today’s fantasy fiction. There’s no longer a blatant moral message or
an unapproachable virtuous hero laying out an artificial image of honor. Today,
when we open fantasy fiction, we are presented with a whole slew of underlined
worldviews, philosophies and messages.
In an interview, sci-fi/fantasy author Michael A. Stackpole
said, “Writers forget that, first and
foremost, we’re entertainers. Anything that gets in the way of that, like a
message poorly delivered, hurts our work and our credibility. Story must carry
a work. If you can get information in or get readers to think about an issue,
that’s a bonus. And there’s nothing wrong with going for the bonus, as long as
it doesn’t overshadow the story.” I believe Stackpole speaks for many
authors here. A writer should always aim to write a good book; but if they can
convey a message in the process, then it could be beneficial. But if a writer
goes into their story with the intent to push forth a message, then it’s more
likely to harm the work.
I don’t
think readers in general care too much about an author interlining a message in
their work; however, no one wants to be beat over the head by a didactic story.
We want to experience how such a lesson affected or changed the character(s). I
think this is the only way that this could work.
For the
readers of Terry Goodkind’s Sword of Truth series, the main complaint of the
latter books in the series is the heavy theme of Objectivism, a philosophy
developed by Ayn Rand, which concludes that reason is man’s basic means of survival;
and that one should pursue life for one’s self (“rational self-interest”). The
philosophy also shuns faith of any kind, because religion is accepted only by
emotion, or it’s something that one is born into—it was not chosen in a
rational sense. Objectivism also teaches that morality is to follow reason to
the best of one’s ability—so that rationality is the basic virtue from which
all the others proceed. These beliefs are circulated throughout Goodkind’s
series, with books like Faith of the
Fallen and Naked Empire really
pushing the Objectivist message. For example, in Faith of the Fallen the main character, Richard Cypher, says, “The only sovereign I can allow to rule me
is reason. The first law of reason is this: what exists, exists; what is, is. From
this irreducible, bedrock principle, all knowledge is built. This is the
foundation from which life is embraced. Reason is a choice. Wishes and whims
are not facts, nor are they a means to discovering them. Reason is our only way
of grasping reality—it's our basic tool of survival. We are free to evade the
effort of thinking, to reject reason, but we are not free to avoid the penalty
of the abyss we refuse to see.” Later on in the book, Richard also says, “Reason is the very substance of truth
itself. The glory that is life is wholly embraced through reason, through this
rule. In rejecting it, in rejecting reason, one embraces death.”
It is
obvious that Terry Goodkind strongly embraces Ayn Rand’s philosophy of
Objectivism. Those who know Ayn Rand’s novels, Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead,
have caught the likenesses in Goodkind’s books (mostly Faith of the Fallen) compared to Rand’s work. Some go as far as saying
that Goodkind is writing fan-fiction based on Rand’s
novels. This takes away some of the originality of the story; and the
maneuvering of the plot to give the characters opportunity to debate and give
speeches to drive the Objectivist message slows the flow of the story.
In an
interview, Terry Goodkind said, “Art is
the way we express the things that are important to us. When you read a story,
you’re seeing what’s important to the author. When you see a story about
characters that inspire us, that artist—that author—is telling you that’s what
inspires him.” Goodkind doesn’t hide the fact that he weaves the tenets of
his beliefs into his story. I believe all authors have something to say in
their stories, but like what Michael A. Stackpole stated, a message not
delivered right could hurt the story—a message should never overshadow the
story.
In my next post I will continue the discussion of messages in fantasy, taking a look at
the works of other well-known authors in the genre.
RELATED POSTS:
Messages in Fantasy – Part 2
RELATED POSTS:
Messages in Fantasy – Part 2
I happened upon your Blog. I really enjoy the quality of the articles you write here. I happen to come from the Tolkien school of fantasy, in that I believe in what Tolkien called "applicability" over allegory. I have no problem in authors putting messages or certain themes in their work, so long as it doesn't become a sort of propaganda extolling certain ideas and detracts from the story. I'll be following your postings.
ReplyDeleteE.J.,
DeleteI'm glad that you're enjoying the blog. Thanks for following... I agree. When authors start pushing an idea way over the story it's a big let down--even if it's a message that I may agree with.